What is another word for lumped together?

Pronunciation: [lˈʌmpt təɡˈɛðə] (IPA)

When it comes to finding synonyms for "lumped together," there are several options available to choose from. The phrase "grouped together" is one such alternative which implies bringing together similar things or individuals into one unit. Another synonym could be "clustered," which relates to creating a set or collection based on similarities. Some other options include "bundled," "packed," "consolidated," "combined," or even "jumbled." Depending on the context, each of these synonyms can replace "lumped together" and provide a different shade of meaning. Ultimately, using synonyms can add flavor, depth, and variety to your writing, making it more engaging and enjoyable to read.

What are the hypernyms for Lumped together?

A hypernym is a word with a broad meaning that encompasses more specific words called hyponyms.

What are the opposite words for lumped together?

The term "lumped together" refers to the act of grouping or amalgamating multiple items into a single entity. Antonyms for this phrase include words that convey disconnection or segmentation, like separate, individualized, distinct, or differentiated. Other antonyms include scattered, dispersed, distributed, or divergent, which indicate a lack of unity or coherence. These antonyms suggest a sense of independence or divergence from the original term, which places a greater emphasis on the fragmentation of the items in question. In essence, antonyms for "lumped together" express the opposite effect, defining a situation where each item stands alone or exists in a state of dissociation.

What are the antonyms for Lumped together?

Famous quotes with Lumped together

  • Also minimalism is a term that all of us who share so little in common and who are lumped together as minimalists are not terribly happy with.
    Ann Beattie
  • Marx imagined the end of scarcity would bring the end of history. He could not bring himself to see that a world without scarcity had already been achieved - in the prehistoric societies that he and Engels lumped together as 'primitive communism'. Hunter-gatherers were less burdened by labour than the majority of mankind at any later stage, but their sparse communities were completely dependent on the Earth's bounty. Natural catastrophe could wipe them out at any time. Marx could not accept the constraint that was the price of the hunter-gatherers' freedom. Instead, animated by the faith that humans are destined to master the Earth, he insisted that freedom from labour could be achieved without any restraints on their desires. This was only the Brethren of the Free Spirit's apocalyptic fantasy returning as an Enlightenment utopia.
    John Gray (philosopher)
  • Why Baroque? Because it is set in the Baroque, and it IS baroque. Why Cycle? Because I am trying to avoid the T-word ("trilogy"). In my mind this work is something like 7 or 8 connected novels. These have been lumped together into three volumes because it is more convenient from a publishing standpoint, but they could just as well have been put all together in a single immense volume or separated into 7 or 8 separate volumes. So to slap the word "trilogy" on it would be to saddle it with a designation that is essentially bogus. Having said that, I know everyone's going to call it a trilogy anyway.
    Neal Stephenson

Word of the Day

inconstructible
The word "inconstructible" suggests that something is impossible to construct or build. Its antonyms, therefore, would be words that imply the opposite. For example, "constructible...