Search

What is another word for in general terms?

Pronunciation: [ɪn d͡ʒˈɛnəɹə͡l tˈɜːmz] (IPA)

When expressing an idea in a broad sense, there are various alternatives to the phrase "in general terms". One can use "broadly speaking" to suggest a general viewpoint without delving into specifics. Alternatively, the phrase "generally" serves to convey information without going into great detail. Another synonym is "typically", which implies a common or expected feature without focusing on precise details. One might also employ the phrase "as a rule" to indicate a general principle or guideline. Similarly, "in a general sense" or "on the whole" can be employed to highlight a broad understanding, while avoiding narrow specifics. Lastly, "broadly defined" could be used to describe the concept in a more general manner.
Opposite words
Antonyms
Famous quotes
Search

What are the opposite words for in general terms?

When we talk about "in general terms," we often mean in broad, sweeping strokes of language that lack specific detail or nuance. Antonyms for this phrase might include "detailed," "specific," or "granular," all of which connote the opposite of the general or abstract. Another antonym for "in general terms" might be "particular," which suggests a focus on specific elements rather than the larger picture. Still, another potential antonym is "nuanced," which implies a subtle and sophisticated understanding that goes beyond generalities. Ultimately, antonyms for "in general terms" are words that convey precision, refinement, and specificity-qualities that can be incredibly valuable in certain contexts.

What are the antonyms for In general terms?

Famous quotes with In general terms

  • The notion that one will not survive a particular catastrophe is, in general terms, a comfort since it is equivalent to abolishing the catastrophe.
    Iris Murdoch
  • For as a hedonist, Bentham apparently bases moral status not on the dignity of rational nature but rather solely on the capacity to feel pleasure and pain. And this is clearly different from the Kantian position. Yet I claim that Bentham’s idea here is in general terms not inconsistent with Kantian ethics but is instead a corollary of the Kantian position. I would even claim that Kantian ethics provides a better justification for it than Bentham’s hedonism–a shallow empiricist doctrine that cannot account properly even for the values it assigns to pleasure and pain in human beings. […] Nonhuman animals do not have the capacity to reason or to talk. Therefore, beyond making the obvious point that they are not persons in the strict sense, whether they have or lack these capacities is irrelevant to how we should treat them. Bentham is therefore correct in telling us not to ask about these matters when we are deciding how to treat animals. What is relevant, because it relates their capacities to those of rational nature, is the fact that they can suffer, and desire, and sometimes also care – about members of their own species, or even occasionally about members of other species, such as humans. Bentham is therefore also correct in telling us what we should ask about these capacities, for they are the relevant ones. Bentham is correct, however, not because Kant is wrong, but because Kant is right.
    Jeremy Bentham
  • This is what matters, but it is unspeakable. Untranslatable: I talk in general terms Because the particular has no language.
    T. S. Eliot
  • Most civilisations, perhaps, look shinier in general terms and from several light-years away.
    Ursula K. Le Guin

Word of the Day

in distress
If you're in need of alternative words for "in distress," don't fret. You can use "in agony" to describe a great deal of physical or emotional pain. If you're feeling overwhelmed o...